Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nulogy Corporation v. Menasha Packaging Company, LLC, et al
as 22-1583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NULOGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
MENASHA PACKAGING COMPANY, LLC, MENASHA CORPORATION, DELOITTE and others
Nulogy Corporation v. Menasha Packaging Company, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01164
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte LLP, Menasha Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Nulogy Corporation
Menasha Corporation v. Westrock Company
as 1:2020cv03242
Defendant:
WESTROCK COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MENASHA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Alvarez v. Menasha Corporation
as 1:2019cv05592
Plaintiff:
Noe Alvarez
Defendant:
Menasha Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Appvion, Incorporated, et al v. Menasha Corporation
as 13-2605
Plaintiff - Appellee:
APPVION, INCORPORATED, formerly known as APPLETON PAPERS, INCORPORATED and NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
MENASHA CORPORATION
Appvion, Inc. v. George A. Whiting Paper Compan, et al
as 13-2522
Plaintiff:
NCR CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APPVION, INCORPORATED, formerly known as APPLETON PAPERS INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER COMPANY, PH GLATFELTER COMPANY, MENASHA CORPORATION and others
NCR Corporation v. George A. Whiting Paper Compan, et al
as 13-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER COMPANY, PH GLATFELTER COMPANY, MENASHA CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.