Cases 1 - 6 of 6
USA v. Charles Thomas
as 19-2926
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS, also known as BIG C also known as WILLIE THOMAS, also known as WALTER DAVIS, also known as CHARLES THOMAS, JR., also known as THOMAS BROWN, also known as BOB GOODFELLA, also known as BOBBY JONES, also known as SAMUEL COLE, also known
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Thomas
as 19-1712
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS, also known as BIG C also known as WILLIE THOMAS, also known as WALTER DAVIS, also known as CHARLES THOMAS, JR., also known as THOMAS BROWN, also known as BOB GOODFELLA, also known as BOBBY JONES, also known as SAMUEL COLE, also known
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Thomas
as 15-1142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS, also known as BIG C also known as WILLIE THOMAS, also known as WALTER DAVIS, also known as CHARLES THOMAS, JR., also known as THOMAS BROWN, also known as BOB GOODFELLA, also known as BOBBY JONES, also known as SAMUEL COLE, also known as DE
STEVE HUNTER et al v. WALTER DAVIS MARBLE & TILE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv00771
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTSMEN HEALTH & WELFARE FUND-TERRE HAUTE, ET. AL., AND INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and STEVE HUNTER
Defendant:
WALTER DAVIS MARBLE & TILE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Davis v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv50040
Plaintiff:
Walter Davis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Truitt et al
as 1:2009cv07337
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Walter Davis
Defendant:
Louse Rose Truitt, Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC and Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
