Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Honeywell Safety Products USA, Inc. v. Akkad Distribution, LLC
as 5:2023mc00046
Plaintiff:
Honeywell Safety Products USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Akkad Distribution, LLC
Gwin et al v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 2:2020cv02199
Plaintiff:
Earlena Warfield and Vanessa Gwin
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Gwin et al v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 2:2020cv02181
Plaintiff:
Earlena Warfield and Vanessa Gwin
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv06063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CIBC Bank USA v. ISI SECURITY GROUP, INC et al
as 5:2018mc00062
Plaintiff:
CIBC Bank USA
Receiver:
Scott E. Eisenberg of Amherst Consulting, LLC
Defendant:
ISI SECURITY GROUP, INC, DETENTION CONTRACTING GROUP, LTD, ISI DETENTION CONTRACTING and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0277
Duggar v. City of Springdale, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05125
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duggar
Defendant:
City of Springdale, Arkansas, Washington County, Arkansas, The State of Arkansas, Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. One Financial Corporation
as 5:2016mc00024
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
One Financial Corporation
Respondent:
One Bank & Trust, N.A. and Tom Prince
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Johnson v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 5:2016cv05018
Plaintiff:
Shelby Johnson
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0277 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
IN RE: UMAREX USA, INC.
as 2:2015mc00042
Plaintiff:
UMAREX USA, Inc.
Respondent:
Michael Swoboda
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
