General Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 613
Jessie Hill v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4119
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Walter McCullough v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4113
Plaintiff - Appellant: Walter A. McCullough
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Larry Norris)
Jackie Breeden, Jr. v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4072
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jackie Breeden, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
David Allen v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4060
Plaintiff - Appellant: David Lee Allen
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jamie Bowen v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4058
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jamie Paul Bowen
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Donald Lee v. NE Department of Corr. Service, et al
as 16-3998
Petitioner - Appellant: Donald M. Lee
Respondent - Appellee: Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Scott Frakes, Department of Correction and Unknown Prison Official
Kendall Nicholson v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 16-3937
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kendall C. Nicholson
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections and Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit
Jessie Hill v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3931
Petitioner - Appellant: Jessie Hill
Respondent - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Richard Ingram v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3873
Plaintiff - Appellant: Richard DeVal Ingram
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
James Holliday v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3853
Plaintiff - Appellant: James A. Holliday
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?