Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2315
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden FMC Rochester, Collette Peters, F.B.O.P. Director and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2467
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden FMC Rochester, Collette Peters, F.B.O.P. Director and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2445
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden F.M.C. Rochester MN, Merrick B. Garland, U.S.A.G. and Collette Peters, Director F.B.O.P.
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-1655
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden F.M.C. Rochester MN, Merrick B. Garland, U.S.A.G. and Collette Peters, Director F.B.O.P.
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El v. Scott Anders
as 23-1436
Petitioner / Appellant:
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Anders
Scott Pratt v. Michele Buckner
as 22-3261
Petitioner / Appellant:
Scott Pratt
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, Warden
Scott Haugan v. State of Iowa, et al
as 22-3216
Petitioner / Appellant:
Scott William Haugan
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Corrections, Marshall County, Iowa and others
Tracy Parnell v. Scott Frakes
as 22-2712
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tracy N. Parnell
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott R. Frakes
Kevin Malone v. State of Nebraska, et al
as 22-2561
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin W. Malone
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Nebraska and Scott R. Frakes, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
