Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Raphael Mendez v. FMC Rochester, et al
as 22-2248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
FMC Rochester, Minnesota, Mr. Beadling, Correctional Officer, Steve Kallis, Warden, SiS and others
Raphael Mendez v. Susan Richard Nelson
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Susan Richard Nelson, et al
Raphael Mendez v. FMC Minnesota, et al
as 17-2438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
FMC Minnesota, Lt. Holbus, (SHU), Officer Kepp and others
Marcus Gamblin v. Nick Ludwick, et al
as 16-4388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marcus Gamblin
Defendant - Appellee:
Nick Ludwick, Mark Roberts, Berl Wilcox and others
Raphael Mendez v. S. Stanton, et al
as 16-1246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
S. Stanton, Chief Psychiatry, MD, B. Glavinovich, Physician Assistant and Any Other Unknown Supporters at FMC Rochester, Minnesota
Raphael Mendez v. Mary Haugen, et al
as 15-3370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Haugen, Unit Manager and All Unknown other at Federal Medical Center (FMC) Rochester Minnesota 55093
Felipe Mendez, Jr. v. John Courter, et al
as 15-2338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felipe Mendez, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
John Courter, AUSA/S.D. Iowa, Daniel Davis, DEA agent, Mark Taylor, ADA Polk County Iowa and others
Raphael Mendez v. Counselor Rosemark, et al
as 14-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Counselor Rosemark, Case Manager Cosette and Other Unknown Members at FMC Rochester, Minnesota, et al.
Ivan Mendez v. United States, et al
as 12-3532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ivan Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, One of the Conected Wired Members, of a Big International Criminal Organization, The Conected Wired Member and others
Raphael Mendez v. Warden B. Jett, et al
as 12-3174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden B. R. Jett and FMC Legal Mail Room
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
