Cases 1 - 10 of 25
United States v. Lucas Floyd
as 23-2090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lucas Frank Floyd
United States v. Floyd Murray
as 23-1201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Floyd Murray
United States v. Floyd Rush
as 22-1608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Floyd D. Rush
Jason Novotny v. Yankton FPC, Warden
as 21-2733
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jason Floyd Novotny
Defendant / Appellee:
Yankton FPC, Warden
James Clark v. Floyd Crues, et al
as 21-1610
Defendant / Appellee:
Darnetta Clinkscale, Shane Hopper, Ken Brostrum and others
Defendant:
Amy Hilgerman, Bill Hass, School Service Systems, (SSS) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Hedman Clark
Plaintiff:
Alternative Discipline and Behavioral Concepts (ADBC)
Floyd County Mutual Insurance v. CNH Industrial America LLC
as 21-1075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Floyd County Mutual Insurance Association, as subrogee on behalf of Clark R. McGregor, on behalf of Ronald R. McGregor Revocable Trust on behalf of McGregor Farms, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
CNH Industrial America LLC
Floyd Smith v. Kendall Penn
as 20-2619
Defendant / Appellee:
Kendall W. Penn, Adjutant General for the State of Arkansas (originally named as Mark Berry)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Floyd T. Smith
William Floyd, Jr. v. Scott Frakes
as 19-3304
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner / Appellant:
William C. Floyd, Jr.
Anthony Floyd v. United States, et al
as 19-1274
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony James Floyd
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos
Anthony Floyd v. United States, et al
as 19-1253
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony James Floyd
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
