Cases 1 - 10 of 36
United States v. Simon Wertenberger
as 24-1542
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Simon L. Wertenberger
Assoc. for Govt. Acc., et al v. Steve Simon, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
Association for Government Accountability, Mark Koran, Senator, Calvin Bahr, Senator and others
Defendant:
Steve Simon, individually and in his official capacity as Minnesota Secretary of State, or his successor and David Maeda, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Elections for State of Minnesota, or his successor
Appellant:
Wisconsin Voter Alliance
United States v. Simon Chuar
as 23-2272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Simon Tongyik Chuar
Simon Quito-Guachichulca v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1069
Petitioner:
Simon Gavino Quito-Guachichulca
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Dylan Brandt, et al v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 21-2875
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dylan Brandt, by and through his mother Joanna Brandt, Joanna Brandt, Sabrina Jennen, by and through her parents Lacey and Aaron Jennen and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Leslie Rutledge, in her official capacity as the Arkansas Attorney General, Amy E. Embry, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Sylvia D. Simon, in official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Little Rock Fam Planning Svcs, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-2857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, on behalf of itself and its patients, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, on behalf of itself and its patients, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Janet R. Cathey, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Sylvia D. Simon, M.D. in her official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as officer/member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Manetirony Clervrain v. Mark Dayton, et al
as 21-1189
Defendant / Appellee:
John Sandweg, Director (ICE), Mark Dayton, Governor, Lori Swanson, Attorney General of Minnesota and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manetirony Clervrain
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Simon Osagi Iyawe, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-3088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Simon Osagi Iyawe and Alicia Nichole Iyawe
Defendant / Appellee:
Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States and Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Tim Walz, et al
as 20-3072
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith M. Ellison, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Minnesota, or his successor, Christopher A. Samuel, in his official capacity as Ramsey County Auditor, or his successor, Mark Vincent Chapin, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Auditor, or his successor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andy Cilek, Craig Jones, Craig Anderson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
