Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Winnie Benson v. Monty Wilkinson
as 21-1352
Respondent:
Monty Wilkinson, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Winnie Benson, also known as Winnie Johnson
Chuol Mai v. Monty Wilkinson
as 21-1342
Respondent:
Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Chuol Peter Mai
Benito Juarez-Ferrer v. Monty Wilkinson
as 21-1326
Respondent:
Monty Wilkinson, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Benito Juarez-Ferrer
Franklin Lopez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-1259
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Jean King, Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel Martinez Lopez, all others similarly situated and Franklin Lopez, all others similarly situated
Pedro Mejia v. Monty Wilkinson
as 21-1254
Respondent:
Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Pedro Mejia
Bradley Burchfield v. Mike McCormick, et al
as 21-1221
Defendant / Appellee:
Chief Elrod, Judge Hernsberger, Members of the United States Congress and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Lilian Lopez-Chavez De Ramos, et al v. Monty Wilkinson
as 21-1218
Petitioner:
Lilian Yanira Lopez-Chavez De Ramos and C.R.
Respondent:
Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of United States
Maura Lopez-Zamora v. Monty Wilkinson
as 21-1222
Petitioner:
Maura Elizabeth Lopez-Zamora
Respondent:
Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Jeffery Edwards v. Monty Whatley, et al
as 19-1709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffery L Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad and Monty Whatley
Monty Shelton v. Gene Beasley
as 17-2855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Monty M. Shelton
Defendant - Appellee:
Gene Beasley, Warden, FCI-Forrest City
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
