Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Christopher Hintz, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Hintz and Sandra Hintz
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., individually and as successor in interest to Washington Mutual Bank and Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.
Christopher Hintz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, et al
as 10-3672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Hintz
Defendant - Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Bank of America, Washington Mutual Asset Acceptance Corp. and others
Eddy Harris v. Wilson & Associates, et al
as 10-3321
Plaintiff:
Gloria G. Harris
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddy S. Harris, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Wilson & Associates, PLLC, Metropolitan National Bank, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Michael Gilmor, et al v. Preferred Credit Corporation, et al
as 10-8017
Petitioner:
Michael P. Gilmor and Shellie Gilmor
Respondent:
Preferred Credit Corporation, IMPAC Funding Corporation, IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and others
Sarah Irene Hancock v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 10-6012
Debtor:
In re: John William Hancock and Sarah Irene Hancock
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sarah Irene Hancock
Defendant - Appellant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Originally Sued As Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Mark A. Bertsch, Donna M. Sommars and others
Chevy Chase Bank v. Clinton Watson
as 10-1228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Chevy Chase Bank
Defendant:
Mary Reyes, George T. and Mary E. Watson Trust, Unknown Heirs, Grantees or Successors of Mary Watson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Clinton L. Watson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-3668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Virginia Cicle v. Chase Bank
as 08-1362
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Virginia Cicle
Defendant - Appellant:
Chase Bank, USA
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
National Association of Consumer Advocates and National Consumer Law Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
