Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Roxana Quijano-Duran, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2457
Petitioner:
Valeria Nicole Moreno Quijano and Roxana Elizabeth Quijano-Duran
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
United States v. Humberto Rivera-Moreno
as 24-1969
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Humberto Rivera-Moreno, also known as Beto, also known as Erik Moctezuma, also known as Erik Moctezuma-Espindola, also known as Eduardo Rivera-Moreno, also known as Jose Chavez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lesly Escobar Moreno De Cancinos, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3120
Petitioner:
Lesly Yazel Escobar Moreno De Cancinos and B.A.C.E.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Elida Franco-Moreno, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1634
Petitioner:
Elida De Los Angeles Franco-Moreno and Robin Wilfredo Rivera-Franco
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Leslie Aranda-Moreno
as 21-2822
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Leslie Aranda-Moreno
Mark Bliven, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-2770
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mark Bliven, Jessica Bowden, Anthony Boykins and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Miguel Aguirre, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3620
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Keith Teribury, Mark Davis, Clyde Hammond and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Jorge Abascal, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3614
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Gregory Stone, Ronnie Whitehead, Dennis Lietzow and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Elida Franco-Moreno, et al v. William Barr
as 20-2935
Petitioner:
Robin Wilfredo Rivera-Franco and Elida De Los Angeles Franco-Moreno
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
