Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Joseph Engel v. ERDCC, et al
as 22-3087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, CO1, CO2 and others
Joseph Engel v. Corizon, et al
as 22-1347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, ERDCC, CO1 and others
Joseph Engel v. CO1, et al
as 22-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
CO1, CO2, Sergeant and others
Joseph Engel v. Corrections Officer I, et al
as 21-2907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Corrections Officer I, Corrections Officer, 2, Sergeant and others
Joseph Engel v. CO1, et al
as 21-2908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
CO1, CO2, SG and others
Joseph Engel v. ERDCC, et al
as 21-2680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, Senator of Missouri, House of Representatives, Missouri and others
Joseph Engel v. Corrections Officer I, et al
as 21-2449
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Governor, Corizon LPN, Institutional Parole Officer Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Joseph Engel v. Corrections Officer, et al
as 21-2378
Defendant / Appellee:
CCA, Institutional Parole Officer Supervisor, Major and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Joseph Engel v. Unknown Correctional Officers, et al
as 21-2384
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Governor, Probation & Parole Director, Assistant Director of Religious Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Joseph Engel v. Corrections Officer I, et al
as 21-2077
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Governor, Corizon LPN, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
