Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Lowe v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Wendie Lowe
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Choate v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00717
Plaintiff:
Deborah Choate
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stratton v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Lois Stratton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gore v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00691
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Gore
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wattenbarger et al v. Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 4:2012cv00673
Plaintiff:
Natocha Wattenbarger and Brian Wattenbarger
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00652
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ratliff
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Legnon v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00659
Plaintiff:
Eve Legnon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00661
Plaintiff:
Nancy Anne Williams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neighbors v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00667
Plaintiff:
Amie Neighbors
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrop et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00648
Plaintiff:
Deette C. Harrop and Lyle R. Harrop
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporation 1-50 (fictitious
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
