Miller Act Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America for the use and benefit of Weidner Plumbing and Heating Co. v. Hernandez Consulting Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Weidner Plumbing and Heating Co.
Defendant: Hernandez Consulting Inc. and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Veit & Company, Inc. v. Drax, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03477
Plaintiff: Veit & Company, Inc. and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Veit & Company, Inc.
Defendant: Drax, Inc. and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Meyer Contracting, Inc., the v. Shinn Kellogg, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv03077
In Re: United States of America for the use and benefit of Meyer Contracting, Inc., the
Defendant: Shinn Kellogg, LLC and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Optimum Mechanical Systems, Inc. v. J.S. Cates Construction, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv03345
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Optimum Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Defendant: J.S. Cates Construction, Inc. and United Fire Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Optimum Mechanical Systems, Inc. v. J.S. Cates Construction, Inc.,et al
as 0:2015cv03326
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Optimum Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Defendant: United Fire Group, Inc. and J.S. Cates Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Design Electric, Inc. v. RPreusser Construction, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv01629
Defendant: RPreusser Construction, Inc. and Granite Re, Inc.
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Design Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Design Electric, Inc. v. RPreusser Construction, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv04774
Defendant: RPreusser Construction, Inc. and West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Design Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of J & J Contractors, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 0:2014cv00476
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of J & J Contractors, Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Optimum Mechanical Systems et al v. Mavcon Services of Michigan, LLC et al
as 0:2013cv01486
Defendant: Mavcon Services of MI, LLC and The Guarantee Company of North America, USA
Plaintiff: Optimum Mechanical Systems and United States
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of DayCo Concrete Company, Inc. v. Mavcon Services of Michigan, LLC et al
as 0:2013cv00562
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of DayCo Concrete Company, Inc.
Defendant: Mavcon Services of Michigan, LLC and Guarantee Company of North America USA, The
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?