Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.73 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01371
Defendant:
Shell Pipe Line Corporation, 0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.46 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01365
Defendant:
David L. Machens, 0.23 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.46 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.78 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01363
Defendant:
Stanolind Pipe Line Co., Kathleen C. Thomas, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.37 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01334
Defendant:
1.06 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.82 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Little Farm, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01369
Defendant:
0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Mary E. Mintert, City of West Alton and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.69 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01333
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 0.55 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.69 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01335
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 0.55 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 2.27 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01342
Defendant:
5.72 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 2.27 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.51 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.12 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01360
Defendant:
1.06 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Michael Stanley Mintert as Trustee of the Michael Stanley Mintert Trust Dated January 10, 2003, 1.12 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.92 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01332
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 0.73 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.48 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
