Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Mitchell v. 3M Company
as 0:2018cv01515
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv01190
Plaintiff:
Randall Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv00367
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Martin
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Corporation, Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balogh et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv05193
Plaintiff:
Connie Balogh , Dennis Basarich , Marien Burns and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Corporation, Bayer AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 0:2017cv04037
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Moore
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03873
Plaintiff:
Douglas Curtis and Maties Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03569
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Mitchell and Margie D. Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03450
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03396
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell and Susan Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03013
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Williams
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
