Cases 91 - 100 of 3,695
Saggio v. Medicredit, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
Jason Saggio
Defendant:
Medicredit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Torres-Navarro
as 6:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Juan Torres-Navarro
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Bouton et al v. Valvoline LLC
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Donald Bouton, Patricia Bouton and Dan Bouton
Defendant:
Valvoline LLC doing business as Valvoline Instant Oil Change 050032
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Thompson v. Replacements, Ltd.
as 4:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Replacements, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Delgado Moreno v. Hernandez Escamilla
as 4:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Delgado Moreno
Respondent:
Itzel Viridiana Hernandez Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. v. Sapient Capital, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sapient Capital, LLC and Sapient Capital Founders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City of St. Joseph, Missouri and City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ebaugh v. Medicredit, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Mary Ebaugh
Defendant:
Medicredit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03071
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
USA v. Courtney
as 6:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Courtney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
