Cases 61 - 70 of 3,696
Doe v. SSM Health Care Corporation
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Doe and SSM Health Care Corporation d/b/a SSM Health
Defendant:
SSM Health Care Corporation doing business as SSM Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Crockett v. Columbia Public Schools et al
as 2:2023cv04158
Plaintiff:
Kendall Wayne Crockett
Defendant:
Columbia Public Schools, Brian Yearwood, Helen Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sommers v. Myers
as 5:2023cv06128
Plaintiff:
Mr John Marcus Sommers, John Marcus Sommers and Lee Sommers
Defendant:
Gary Myers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Huey v. Levy & Associates
as 4:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Robin Huey
Defendant:
Levy & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Hasan
as 6:2023cv03251
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Michael Hasan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
USA v. Twine
as 6:2023cv03236
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David Twine
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Mendoza Mendoza v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Mendoza Mendoza
Defendant:
John E. Roessler and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Daniels v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 4:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Kyla Daniels
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Pop's Market & Grill et al v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Pop's Market & Grill and Mustafa Esheh
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Shepherd
as 6:2023cv03225
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Terriance Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
