Social Security Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Carter v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv01721
Plaintiff: Quina V. Carter
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McDonough v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03052
Plaintiff: Angela V. McDonough
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Welsch v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00687
Plaintiff: Patricia V. Welsch
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Davis v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01065
Plaintiff: Alexander V. Davis
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kendricks v. Saul
as 6:2021cv03111
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Demarco V. Kendricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunn v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00984
Plaintiff: Kevin V. Dunn
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Presson v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00516
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Robert V. Presson
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jackson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv04044
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Kiddtric V. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lake v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00205
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Vance V. Lake, Sr.
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Angel v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv03053
Plaintiff: Mark V. Angel
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?