Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Howard v. James B Nutter & Company et al
as 4:2016mc00153
Plaintiff:
Chevalier Peree Howard
Defendant:
James B Nutter & Company, James B. Nutter, Jr., James B. Nutter, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Moseley et al
as 4:2014mc00513
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
Richard F. Moseley, Sr., Richard F. Moseley, Jr., Christopher J. Randazzo and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Moseley et al
as 4:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
Richard F Moseley, Sr. , Richard F Moseley, Jr. , Christopher J Randazzo and others
Interested_party:
Thomas W. McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
O'Donnell v. Financial Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dan O'Donnell, Sr.
Defendant:
Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vaughn v. State of Missouri
as 6:2011cv03249
Plaintiff:
Alton Louis Vaughn, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
