Cases 31 - 40 of 2,080
Mogtabi Azrag v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1560
Petitioner:
Mogtabi Hassan Azrag
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Laura Baldwin v. Joshua Devine, et al
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua C. Devine, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M.J. Crane, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge and others
Giobel Canete v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1532
Petitioner:
Giobel Fonseca Canete
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Jesus Alvarado-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1501
Petitioner:
Jesus Alvarado-Alvarado
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, The Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Alejandro Cataneda-Zavala v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1437
Petitioner:
Alejandro Antonio Cataneda-Zavala
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reed v. United States Attorney Office District of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Tony Lendell Reed
Defendant:
United States Attorney Office District of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Eva Alvizures-Ramirez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1259
Petitioner:
Eva Jazmin Alvizures-Ramirez and Jenny Alvizures-Ramirez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Shelton Partee v. Steven Lewis, et al
as 24-8001
Petitioner:
Shelton Partee
Respondent:
Steven Lewis, Attorney for Aziz, Michael K. Mullen, Probate Judge, Jill M. Hanley, Public Administrator #1 and others
Josselyn Alvarez-Castillo v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1148
Petitioner:
Josselyn Alvarez-Castillo
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
