Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co
as 4:2011mc00516
Movant:
Laura L. Fortman and Chris Schulte
Plaintiff:
David Kardonick
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Thomas et al v. US Bank NA ND et al
as 5:2011cv06013
Plaintiff:
Deanthony Thomas , Susan Jelinek-Thomas , Steven M. Rich and others
Defendant:
US Bank NA ND , US Bank , Ace Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shawd v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 4:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ronald Shawd
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and Servicelink LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilmor v. Preferred Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor and others
Defendant:
Preferred Credit Corporation, IMPAC Funding Corporation, IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sutton v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
as 6:2007cv03257
Plaintiff:
Gerald R Sutton
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sutton v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
as 6:2007cv03258
Plaintiff:
Gerald R Sutton
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
