Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodolfo Gastelum-Flores v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2741
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Gastelum-Flores
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Reyes-Flores
as 0:2013cv01569
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Oscar Reyes-Flores
Ribelino Avendano v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2171
Petitioner:
Ribelino Alberto Avendano, also known as Ribelino Flores-Avendano
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Mario Flores-Rodriguez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 13-1950
Petitioner:
Mario Alberto Flores-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of United States
Victor Flores-Barillas v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 13-1817
Petitioner:
Victor Santos Flores-Barillas
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Satornino Flore
as 13-1700
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Satornino Flores, also known as Nino
Rodrigo Flores v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-1303
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Flores Flores
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.