Cases 41 - 50 of 120
United States v. Mario Smith
as 19-2316
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Darnell Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Mario Holmes
as 19-1135
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Holmes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Darrell Cato, et al v. OK Food
as 16-8023
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Darrell Cato, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey Biggs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Margee Williams, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
OK Foods, Inc.
Mario Ortiz, et al v. Ferrellgas Partners, et al
as 16-4086
:
In re: In Re: Pre -Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mario Ortiz, Stephen Morrison, Steven Tseffos and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Venezia, Michael S. Harvey, Gregory Ludvigsen and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ferrellgas Partners, LP a limited partnership, Ferrellgas, LP a limited partnership, doing business as Blue Rhino, AmeriGas Propane, LP a limited partnership, doing business as AmeriGas Cylinder Exchange and others
United States v. Mario Stevenson
as 16-3726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Mario Deshawn Stevenson
United States of America v. Mario Murillo-Mora
as 16-3525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Mario Murillo-Mora
United States v. Vincent Benshoof
as 16-1671
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Vincent Mario Benshoof, also known as Vincente Mario Benshoof, also known as Vincente Mario Benshoff
USA v. Holmes
as 6:2016cv03085
Defendant:
Mario Holmes
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
