Cases 1 - 10 of 1,334
Yocksan Herrera-Davila v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2107
Petitioner:
Yocksan Rolando Herrera-Davila
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Hu-Yu, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01903
Plaintiff:
Hu-Yu, Inc. d/b/a City Wok
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pyramid Logistics, Inc. v. Top Flight Delivery, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
PYRAMID LOGISTICS, INC., d/b/a REYNOLDS LOGISTICS
Defendant:
TOP FLIGHT DELIVERY, INC. and DYNAMIC LIFECYCLE INNOVATIONS INC.
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-2027
Petitioner:
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, P.T.M., S.T.M. and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Emmanuel Tiah v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2010
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Dwah Tiah
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Juan Leon Mejia v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1948
Petitioner:
Juan Rufino Leon Mejia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
VonDeylen v. Broadleaf Marketing & SEO LLC
as 0:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
Kristi VonDeylen
Defendant:
Broadleaf Marketing & SEO LLC d/b/a Prime Directory Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gregg Colton v. Lime Rock Resources GP V, LP, et al
as 24-8006
Petitioner:
Gregg B. Colton, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons
Respondent:
Lime Rock Resources GP V, LP, Lime Rock Resources III-A GP, LLC, Lime Rock Resources III-A, LP and others
Diego Morales-Ortega v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1910
Petitioner:
Diego Herlindo Morales-Ortega
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Maria Weidenburner v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1903
Petitioner:
Maria Isabel Weidenburner
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
