Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tarone Jones v. United States
as 22-2446
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Amanda Jones v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 20-2728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Amanda M. Jones, Individually and on Behalf of all Arkansans Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Andrew Walker v. John Henderson, et al
as 19-1520
Defendant:
Bland, APN, CCS, John Doe, Employee, Administration, Classification Committee, Wrightsville Unit, ADC, Melanie Jones, Doctor, CCS (originally named as M. Jones) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew S. Walker
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephen M. Cockrell, Sergeant, Wrightsville Unit, ADC (originally named as S. Cockrell) and John L. Henderson, Sergeant, Wrightsville Unit, ADC (originally named as J. Henderson)
Tarone Jones v. United States
as 19-1179
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Tarone Jones v. United State
as 16-3825
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Tarone Jones v. United States
as 16-2504
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Tarone Jones v. United State
as 16-1328
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Tarone Jones v. United State
as 14-2505
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Jones et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 0:2009cv03096
Plaintiff:
David M. Jones, David M. Jones, David M. Jones and others
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
