Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Deanthony Thomas, et al v. US Bank NA ND, et al
as 14-2265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deanthony Thomas, Susan Jelinek-Thomas, Steven M. Rich and others
Defendant:
US Bank NA ND, FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust, 1996-2, FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust 1996-3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Bank National Association, Ace Securities Corp. Home Loan Trust 1999-A, Associates First Capital Corporation, doing business as The Associates and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 11-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, James Corwin, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant:
Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, Steven Kruse, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Bowling Green, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and Tim Fitch, in his official capacity as Chief of the St. Louis County, Missouri, Police Department
Thomas et al v. US Bank NA ND et al
as 5:2011cv06013
Plaintiff:
Deanthony Thomas , Susan Jelinek-Thomas , Steven M. Rich and others
Defendant:
US Bank NA ND , US Bank , Ace Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jane Doe I, et al v. Robert P. McCulloch, et al
as 08-3510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Matt Blunt, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah W. Nixon, et al
as 08-3476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri and Matt Blunt, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri
Defendant:
Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Steven Schicker, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Ballwin, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and others
Doe I et al v. Nixon et al
as 4:2008cv01518
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, John Doe I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, Thomas O'Connor, Steven Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
