Cases 1 - 10 of 5,289
Northway Market v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 4:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Northway Market
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
MM&A Market v. United States of America Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 4:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
MM&A Market
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Expert Management, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Expert Management, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Defense, Secretary of the Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Ronald Jackson v. United States
as 24-2137
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Christopher Ward-Malone v. United States
as 24-2117
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Ward-Malone
Respondent:
United States of America
William Graham v. United States
as 24-2131
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
United States of America
MCTA v. FCC, et al
as 24-2092
Petitioner:
Missouri Internet & Television Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
5 Star Market, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
5 Star Market, Inc. a Missouri Corporation doing business as 5 Star Market and Nader Abdesumad
Defendant:
United States of America
Kamil Johnson v. United States
as 24-2049
Petitioner:
Kamil Hakeem Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Marcus Royston v. United States
as 24-2044
Appellant:
Marcus Jermaine Royston
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
