Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Nickels v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv03005
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Monica Nickels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frazier v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Lori Frazier
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp., N.V. Organon Schering Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00268
Defendant:
Bunzl Distribution USA, Inc., Hilex Poly Co, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William S. Freis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harrell et al v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
as 8:2013cv00247
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joyce Harrell and Rickey Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Nichols v. United States of America
as 8:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Claude E. Nichols
Defendant:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rehm
as 4:2010cv03189
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Organon International, Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Robeson and Steve Robeson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonacci et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bonacci and Melanie Bonacci
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Hoover v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 8:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hoover
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McGinley et al v. Medtronic USA et al
as 8:2007cv00424
Plaintiff:
Nancy McGinley
Defendant:
Medtronic USA and Medtronic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
