Cases 51 - 60 of 109
United States of America et al v. Medtronic Inc
as 0:2017cv03770
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. and Cavallino Consulting LLC
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Tucker v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv03669
Plaintiff:
Sara Tucker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Al-Aryan v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv02086
Plaintiff:
Alicia Adelaide Al-Aryan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Uke v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv01316
Plaintiff:
Patrick Uke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Shelstad v. The United States of America
as 0:2017cv00622
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shelstad
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Newcombe v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv00454
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newcombe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America National Guard et al
as 0:2016cv04401
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America National Guard and Alexander Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
McNally v. United States of America et al
as 0:2016cv04084
Plaintiff:
Shawn McNally
Defendant:
United States of America and St. Francis Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
United States of America ex rel. et al v. Modern Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv03014
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel. and John Christie
Defendant:
Modern Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. and Hue Van Lien
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Piekarski v. United States of America et al
as 0:2016cv01752
Defendant:
United States of America and Matthew DeSilva
Plaintiff:
Michael Piekarski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
