Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Wiirre v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2007cv04508
Plaintiff:
Louis Wiirre, Louis Wiirre and Louis Wiirre
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., Owens-Illinois, Inc, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Dale v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2007cv04476
Plaintiff:
Norman E. Dale and Norman E. Dale
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., Owens-Illinois, Inc, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Baker v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2007cv04470
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Baker, Edward C. Baker and Edward C. Baker
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., Owens-Illinois, Inc, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tabery v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2007cv04503
Plaintiff:
Phillip A Tabery, Phillip A Tabery and Phillip A Tabery
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., Owens-Illinois, Inc, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Husby v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2007cv04486
Plaintiff:
Dwight E. Husby and Dwight E. Husby
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., Owens-Illinois, Inc, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Sharbonda v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2007cv04501
Plaintiff:
Harold Sharbonda and Harold Sharbonda
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C., Owens-Illinois, Inc, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
