Cases 101 - 110 of 203
Bryant et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02188
Plaintiff:
Brian Burtsfield, Bradley Wade Caraviello, Keith Collins and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Does 1-50 and others
Zumwalt v. Protect My Car
as 0:2019cv02194
Plaintiff:
Travis Zumwalt
Defendant:
Advanced Marketing & Processing, Inc. and Protect My Car
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0252
Strosnider et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02139
Plaintiff:
Robert Mauer, Paul Perdue, Hugh Powell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Wyatt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02141
Plaintiff:
James Acuff, Jacob Ramsel, Aaron Brooks and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Claybrook et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02144
Plaintiff:
Arthur Amos, Lanorma Murdock, Phillip Bays and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Parker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02153
Plaintiff:
Michael Long, Brad Blair, Jonathon Barnica and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Boyer et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02134
Plaintiff:
Ryan Simpson, Nicklaus Napier, John Cifuni and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Naranjo et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02100
Plaintiff:
Carmen John, Derek McDermeit, Andrew De La O and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Coffey et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02101
Plaintiff:
Frederick Robinson, Valonza Dixon, Travis Morrow and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cordingly et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02103
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox, Clifford Riley, Peter Carothers and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
