Cases 11 - 17 of 17
City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa
as 13-3408
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellant:
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 0:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Bob Perciasepe, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 and others
City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa
as 11-3883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellant:
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa
as 11-3884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellee:
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
Fond Du Lac Band v. Ward Einess
as 10-1236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
Defendant - Appellee:
Ward Einess, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue
Duluth, City of v. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
as 0:2009cv02668
Plaintiff:
Duluth, City of, Duluth, City of and Duluth, City of
Defendant:
Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and others
Counter Claimant:
Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and others
Counter Defendant:
Duluth, City of, Duluth, City of and Duluth, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. Einess
as 0:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
Defendant:
Ward Einess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
