Cases 41 - 50 of 222
Cross et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
Christopher Campo, Michael Chlamon, Daniel Bowers and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Despot et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02236
Plaintiff:
Adam Mulvey, Richard Buchanan, Brett Norton and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Holder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02239
Plaintiff:
Steven Gliddon, Samuel Young, Richard Hoppis, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Friar et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02248
Plaintiff:
Larry Tittle, Keith Ackerman, Enace Lococo and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Parker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02153
Plaintiff:
Michael Long, Brad Blair, Jonathon Barnica and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bryant et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02188
Plaintiff:
Brian Burtsfield, Bradley Wade Caraviello, Keith Collins and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Does 1-50 and others
Adkins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02122
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Foss, Christopher Henson, Wilbert Ivory and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Boyer et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02134
Plaintiff:
Ryan Simpson, Nicklaus Napier, John Cifuni and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02043
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Jordan Blackburn, Ricardo Dixon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
