Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Concepcion v. Tripp
as 4:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Edgar Concepcion, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Tripp
as 4:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stringer v. Wilcox et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
William L. Stringer
Defendant:
LaDonna Wilcox, Adam Benda, Chris Tripp and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sayles v. Gibbs, et al
as 3:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Terrance Durell Sayles
Defendant:
Iowa State Penitentiary, Iowa Department of Corrections, Randy Gibbs and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashburn v. Skinner et al
as 4:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ashburn
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Randy Gibbs, Chris Tripp and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krier v. Tripp
as 4:2021cv00295
Petitioner:
Sean Krier
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon v. Doe et al
as 4:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Doe, Thompson, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiseman v. Tripp
as 4:2021cv00161
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Wiseman
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schreiber v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2020cv00233
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Benjamin E. Schreiber
Respondent:
Chris Tripp and Randy Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong et al v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00271
Defendant:
Rory Ingwerson, Jerry Bartruff, Chris Tripp and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Slater, Jonathan R. Armstrong and Devontae Hearn
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
