Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Garcia-Fabela v. Garland
as 24-3883
Petitioner:
GONZALO GARCIA-FABELA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Sanchez-Perez v. Garland
as 23-800
Petitioner:
GONZALO SANCHEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gavidia- Salgado, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1583
Petitioner:
FATIMA GABRIELA GAVIDIA-SALGADO, ANDERSON GONZALO GAVIDIA-SALGADO and SIGFREDO ARISTIDES NAVARRETE GAVIDIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 21-15195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director and MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al
as 21-15197
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant:
NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Robinso Orozco-Gomez, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73707
Petitioner:
YAKELIN SELENA MENDEZ-FLORES, JOSHUA YADIEL OROZCO-MENDEZ, ROBINSO GONZALO OROZCO-GOMEZ and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Gonzalo Garcia-Vasquez v. William Barr
as 20-73549
Petitioner:
GONZALO GARCIA-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Gonzalo Flores v. William Barr
as 20-73279
Petitioner:
GONZALO FLORES, AKA Gonzalez Flores-Castaneda
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Gonzalo Rubang, Jr. v. Ally Financial, Inc.
as 20-16866
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLY FINANCIAL, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GONZALO R. RUBANG, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
