Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Abdirahman Kariye, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 23-55790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDIRAHMAN ADEN KARIYE, MOHAMAD MOUSLLI and HAMEEM SHAH
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, STEVE K. FRANCIS, Acting Executive Associate Director, Homeland Security Investigations, in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
MARK MORGAN, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity
Joseph Brady v. Matt Grimm, et al
as 23-55359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH BRADY
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT GRIMM, Chief Operating Officer, Anuril Industries, ANURIL INDUSTRIES, a California Limited Liability Company, Irvine, California, LESLIE GARDNER, as Executive Director of the San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center Carlsbad, California, in her official capacity and in her personal capacity and others
Rubia Morales-Alfaro v. USA, et al
as 23-55200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBIA MABEL MORALES-ALFARO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CORECIVIC, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Arturo Valencia Barrera v. USDHS, et al
as 23-15114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTURO OSIEL VALENCIA BARRERA
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and DOES, DHS Officer #1449; Dhs Officer #985; Tempe DHS Officer
Firdos Sheikh v. USDHS, et al
as 22-16983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIRDOS SHEIKH
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CAROL WEBSTER, Special Agent of U.S and EUGENE KIZENKO, DHS Special Agent
Mark Higgins, et al v. Mark Higgins, et al
as 22-16470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ROCK HIGGINS, beneficiary private irish moor aboriginal Arizonian national, subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and HIGGINS FAMILY TRUST, a private express trust trustee of Mark Rock Higgins
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ROCK HIGGINS, Mark Rock Higgins Estate, SEAN RICK HIGGINS, Sean Rick Higgins Estate, TYLER ROCK HIGGINS, Tyron Rock Higgins Estate and others
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
Ronnie Todd v. Estate of Ronnie Ramael Todd, et al
as 22-16329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD, RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
North American Association of Visionary Churches, et al v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-16287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VISIONARY CHURCHES, a California Corporation
Plaintiff:
ARIZONA YAGE ASSEMBLY, a California corporation, VINE OF LIGHT CHURCH and WINFIELD SCOTT STANLEY III
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Mark Brnovich, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15518
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA, AL REBLE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
