Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Joe McMurray, et al v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al
as 09-17133
:
In re: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE MCMURRAY, Rev., CHARLENE MANN, Rev., MICHAEL REUSCH, Dr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., BELLSOUTH CORPORATION, AT&T CORPORATION and others
James Joll, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 09-16723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JOLL, RAMON GOGGINS, IAN WALKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORP., AT&T INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Darryl Hines, et al v. Verizon Northwest, Inc., et al
as 09-16706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL HINES, ALEX KLABACKA, JANA KLABACJA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC., an active Washington corporation, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an active Delaware corporation and VERIZON
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Charles Bissitt, et al v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al
as 09-16682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES F. BISSITT, SANDRA BISSITT, GEORGE HAYEK, III and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and VERIZON
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Hepting, et al v. AT&T Corporation, et al
as 06-17132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, GREGORY HICKS, ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T CORPORATION
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Defendant-intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicu:
SUSAN FREIWALD, Amici Law Professor, THE CENTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES, THE CALIFORNIA FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
ROBERT M. CHESNEY, UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
