Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gregory Smith v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden of S.V.S.P., R. MACHUCA, Jr., Correctional Sergeant at S.V.S.P. and others
Reginald Gary v. M. Spearman, et al
as 14-16401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD A. GARY
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SPEARMAN, Warden, A. HEDGPETH, R. WHITE, A. W. Business and others
Edy Ramirez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-15771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDY RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, G. BIAGGINI and others
Anthony Johnson, Jr. v. R. Fritz, et al
as 13-17084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY WAYNE JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. W. FRITZ, A. HEDGPETH, T. SELBY and others
Eugene Hamilton v. J. Rhoads, et al
as 13-15217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. RHOADS, C. SHYTLE, Correctional Registered Nurse II, E. TALONOA and others
Eric Knapp v. James Tilton, et al
as 12-17684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, MICHAEL S. EVANS, ARCEO and others
Robert Smith, III v. State of California, et al
as 12-17019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. SMITH, III
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and A. HEDGPETH
Harold Franklin v. K. Flores, et al
as 12-16404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD VINCENT FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
K. FLORES, Correctional Officer, J. E. COLEMAN, Correctional Counselor I, J. ACEVES, Sergeant, Correctional Officer and others
Treandous Cotton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREANDOUS A. COTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Warden, G. A. NEOTTI, Deputy Chief and others
Eric Knapp v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-17725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TILTON, MICHAEL S. EVANS, ARCEO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
