Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-55510
Petitioner:
MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ERNEST M. SANTACRUZ, Jr., Acting Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations,, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center, and others
Zachary Nightingale, et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigrati, et al
as 21-15288
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COURTNEY BRYN MCDERMED, ZACHARY MILLER NIGHTINGALE, CHERYL DAVID and others
Satbay Kydyrali v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-55014
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center and others
Petitioner:
SATBAY KYDYRALI
Million Gebrelibanos v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-55001
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, GREGORY ARCHAMBEAULT, Director of San Diego Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, MELISSA JIMENEZ, Officer In Charge and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MILLION WELDEMHRET GEBRELIBANOS
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56329
Petitioner:
MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 20-56297
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Francisco Munoz Ortiz v. William Barr, et al
as 20-36050
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN LANGFORD, Warden, Tacoma Northwest Detention Center, NATHALIE ASHER, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Field Office Director (Tacoma ICE) and others
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MUNOZ ORTIZ
Carlos Vargas-Gutierrez v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-73535
Respondent:
TONY H. PHAM, Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
CARLOS VARGAS-GUTIERREZ
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56257
Petitioner:
MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
