Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Mark Higgins, et al v. Mark Higgins, et al
as 22-16470
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK ROCK HIGGINS, beneficiary private irish moor aboriginal Arizonian national, subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and HIGGINS FAMILY TRUST, a private express trust trustee of Mark Rock Higgins
Defendant / Appellee: MARK ROCK HIGGINS, Mark Rock Higgins Estate, SEAN RICK HIGGINS, Sean Rick Higgins Estate, TYLER ROCK HIGGINS, Tyron Rock Higgins Estate and others
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee: ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
Ronnie Todd v. Estate of Ronnie Ramael Todd, et al
as 22-16329
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust
Defendant / Appellee: ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD, RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
North American Association of Visionary Churches, et al v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-16287
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VISIONARY CHURCHES, a California Corporation
Plaintiff: ARIZONA YAGE ASSEMBLY, a California corporation, VINE OF LIGHT CHURCH and WINFIELD SCOTT STANLEY III
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55766
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35325
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Mark Brnovich, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15518
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA, AL REBLE and others
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al
as 22-35276
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Defendant / Appellee: GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES, RUSSELL E. BURGER and others
Defendant: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie and others
Mark Pettibone, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al
as 22-35183
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK PETTIBONE, FABIYM ACUAY, AKA Mac Smiff, ANDRE MILLER and others
Plaintiff: BLACK MILLENIAL MOVEMENT, an organization and ROSE CITY JUSTICE, INC., an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellant: GABRIEL RUSSELL, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee: PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?