Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Guardian News & Media LLC, et al v. Charles Ryan
as 17-17083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA LLC, ASSOCIATED PRESS, ARIZONA REPUBLIC, a division of Phoenix Newspapers Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-55961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peter Tia v. Honolulu Police Department, et al
as 18-15576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, DE CAIRES, Officer, WALMART and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guardian News & Media LLC, et al v. Charles Ryan
as 17-17083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA LLC, ASSOCIATED PRESS, ARIZONA REPUBLIC, a division of Phoenix Newspapers Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Antonio Sanchez Ochoa v. Ed Campbell, et al
as 17-35679
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTONIO SANCHEZ OCHOA
Defendant - Appellant:
ED W. CAMPBELL, Director of Yakima County Department of Corrections, SCOTT HIMES, Chief of the Yakima County Department of Corrections and YAKIMA COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-16248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Riggs v. William Sandie, et al
as 17-16197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARVEY RIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM SANDIE, Acting Warden, LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
