Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-17667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rowdy Brock v. Washington State Department of, et al
as 09-36037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROWDY DANE BROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a government corporation, IDA RUDOLPH-LEGGETT, Washington State Administrator for the Interstate Compact Commission, JOE VANBUSKIRK, Community Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-17136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gustave Link v. State of California, et al
as 09-16929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVE WILLIAM LINK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY G. BROWN, California Attorney General, JULIAN O. STANDEN, California Deputy General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert King, Jr. v. Joe Capps, et al
as 09-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HADEN KING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE E. CAPPS, Inspector III, RON MYERS, Hearings Officer, WADE SCROGHAM, Hearings Administrator and others
George Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme Court, et al
as 08-17570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE LLOYD MOTHERSHED, I, pro se
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF ARIZONA, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Kevin Clark v. Town of Buckeye, et al
as 08-15614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN CHARLES CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF BUCKEYE, a municipal corporation, MUREL STEPHENS, in his official capacity as Hearing Officer for the Town of Buckeye Arizona Personnel Board, DUSTIN HULL, Dusty Hull, in his official capacity as Mayor of the Town of Bukeye and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
