Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Andrew Burnett v. City of Santa Clara, et al
as 11-15890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW BURNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, STEPHEN D. LODGE, Chief of Police, Santa Clara PD, JULIE FREITAS and others
Lewis Peterson v. UPRC, et al
as 10-56959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS D. PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and JASON ZATT
Peter Szanto v. Charles Crandall, et al
as 10-56055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER SZANTO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES STEVENS CRANDALL, Judge of the California Superior Court, EDWARD DONALD THIRKELL, ROBERT SAMUEL LEWIN and others
Harjit Bhambra v. John True, III, et al
as 10-16246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARJIT BHAMBRA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN M. TRUE, III, CECLIA CASTELLANOS, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-16168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-15326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Balthrope, II v. Sacramento County Department o, et al
as 09-17213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BENNING BALTHROPE, II
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KRISTEN PARSKE, Social Worker GK84, CHRISTINA JUAREZ, Social Worker ZCE1 and others
Tash Hepting, et al
as 09-16670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, CAROLYN JEWEL and others
Travis Cross, et al v. AT&T Communications, Inc., et al
as 09-16688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS CROSS, JOHN ELDER, GABRIEL FILEPPELLI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AT&T CORP., AT&T TELEHOLDINGS, INC., FKA SBC and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
