Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-55541
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-56492
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35685
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Timothy Whiting v. Stan Henry, et al
as 11-56246
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY LEWIS WHITING
Defendant - Appellee: STAN HENRY, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Cathedral City Police Department, STANLEY SNIFF, individually as Sheriff of Riverside County, DAVID G. DOMINGUEZ, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Palm Springs Police Department and others
Gabriel Ruiz-Diaz, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35580
Plaintiff - Appellant: GABRIEL RUIZ-DIAZ, HYUN SOOK SONG, CINDY LEE MARSH and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Center for Constitutional Righ, et al v. Barack Obama, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-15956
: In re: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, TINA M. FOSTER, GITANJALI S. GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant - Appellee: BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, Ltg. Keith B. Alexander, Director, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Ltg. Ronald L. Burgess, Jr., Director and others
Michael Moss, et al v. Tim Wood, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36172
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL MOSS, LESLEY ADAMS, BETH WILCOX and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, of the Department of Homeland Security, RALPH BASHAM, Former Director of the United States Secret Service, in his individual capacity, JOHN DOE, 1, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities, participating in these actions and known to the Defendant Secret Service, but unknown at this time to Plaintiffs and others
Defendant - Appellant: TIM WOOD, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities and ROB SAVAGE, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities
Michael Moss, et al v. Ron Ruecker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36152
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL MOSS, LESLEY ADAMS, BETH WILCOX and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, of the Department of Homeland Security, RALPH BASHAM, Former Director of the United States Secret Service, in his individual capacity, TIM WOOD, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant: RON RUECKER, Superintendent of the Oregon State Police, in his official and individual capacities, ERIC RODRIQUEZ, former Captain of the Southwest Regional Headquarters of the Oregon State Police, in his official and individual capacities, TIM F. MCCLAIN, Superintendent of the Oregon State Police, in his official capacity and others
Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36136
Plaintiff - Appellant: KWAI FUN WONG and WU-WEI TIEN TAO ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID V. BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (nka Department of Homeland Security) Official and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35862
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?