Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Maureen Murphy, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-35166
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAUREEN MURPHY, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and JOHN HUDDLESTON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee: GINA RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, a federal agency, ROBERT SANTOS, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of the Census and others
Steven Tucker, et al v. Don Verrett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16558
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVEN LEE TUCKER, a married man
Plaintiff: GAIL TUCKER
Defendant / Appellee: DON VERRETT, In his individual and official capacity as a senior parole officer at Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, NICOLE STUDER, In her individual and official capacity as a parole manager at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, PAM JENSEN, In her individual and official capacity as aparole supervisor at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center and others
Defendant: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NICHOLAS RATKEVICH, In his individual and official capacity as a correctional officer with the Arizona Department of Corrections, at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, MAUREEN RODRIGUEZ, In her individual and official capacity as the Southern Regional IT Manager at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center and others
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant: YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
Mark Pettibone, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35183
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK PETTIBONE, FABIYM ACUAY, AKA Mac Smiff, ANDRE MILLER and others
Plaintiff: BLACK MILLENIAL MOVEMENT, an organization and ROSE CITY JUSTICE, INC., an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellant: GABRIEL RUSSELL, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Jamal Trulove v. Maureen D'Amico, et al
as 18-16540
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMAL RASHID TRULOVE
Defendant - Appellant: MAUREEN D'AMICO, ROBERT T. MCMILLAN, MICHAEL E. JOHNSON and others
Kirk Erichsen, et al v. County of Orange, et al
as 17-56451
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIRK R. ERICHSEN, an individual, KRYSTAL ERICHSEN, an individual, Z. E., a minor and others
Appellant: CHANDLER PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, TUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Chad Cowan v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 16-56673
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHAD COWAN
Defendant - Appellee: JERRY BROWN, Governor, MAUREEN HALLAHAN, Judge, PENNIE MCLAUGHLIN, Commissioner and others
Maureen Richter, et al v. City of Renton, et al
as 12-35956
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAUREEN P RICHTER, 23651 104th Avenue Kent, WA 98031-3315, MOLLY RICHTER and MEGAN MCKEE, 23651 104th Avenue Kent, WA 98031-3315
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation, TODD FRAZIER, both individually and in his official capacity, KEVIN MILOSEVICH, in his official capacity and others
Maureen Richter v. City of Des Moine We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35370
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAUREEN P RICHTER
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF DES MOINES, a municipal corporation
Vahe Khachatourian v. Hacienda La Puene USD, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55364
Plaintiff - Appellant: VAHE KHACHATOURIAN
Defendant: HACIENDA LA PUENE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant - Appellee: MAUREEN SCANLON, ROBERT CASPER, FERNANDO SANCHEZ and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?