Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Raul Labrador, et al
as 23-35518
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, On Behalf of Itself, It's Staff, Physicians and Patients, CAITLIN GUSTAFSON, On Behalf of Herself and Her Patients and DARIN WEYHRICH, On Behalf of Himself and His Patients
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL R. LABRADOR, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF THE IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF NURSING, In Their Official Capacities, COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, In Their Official Capacities and others
Yaquelin Ordonez v. Warren Stanley, et al
as 23-55540
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YAQUELIN SEVASTIANA ORDONEZ, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN A. STANLEY, individual capacity, CHARLES SAMPSON, Sr., individual capacity, A. BRAAKSMA, Sgt. (No. 16551), individual capacity and others
Jared Bailey v. City of Olympia Prosecutor, et al
as 23-35411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARED J. BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OLYMPIA PROSECUTOR, AKA R. Tye Graham, AKA Rosemary Hewitson, THURSTON COUNTY JAIL, CITY OF OLYMPIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
William Graven v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GRAVEN, Named as Will
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General, MICHAEL BAILEY, for acts as Asst AG and Chief of Staff, DON CONRAD, for acts as Chief of the Criminal Division and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 22-16855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Irene Bailey, et al v. Edwin Dumaguindin, et al
as 22-56001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IRENE BAILEY, as the representative for the Estate of Anthony McClain, Sr. and ARCHIE BARRY, individually, and as successor-in-interest for Decedent, Anthony McClain
Plaintiff:
DIONDRA WILLIAMS, Guardian ad Litem for Minor S.M., SOLEMULI AFAESE, Guardian ad Litem for Minor A.M. and B. A. M., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Kimberly Jenkins, individually and as successor in interest to Anthony Guydale McClain, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
PASADENA PD OFC EDWIN DUMAGUINDIN, OFC C. ROSA, CHIEF JOHN PEREZ and others
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diondra Williams, et al v. Edwin Dumaguindin, et al
as 22-55471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIONDRA WILLIAMS, Guardian ad Litem for Minor S.M., SOLEMULI AFAESE, Guardian ad Litem for Minor A.M. and IRENE BAILEY, as the representative for the Estate of Anthony McClain, Sr.
Plaintiff:
B. A. M., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Kimberly Jenkins, individually and as successor in interest to Anthony Guydale McClain, Deceased and ARCHIE BARRY, individually, and as successor-in-interest for Decedent, Anthony McClain
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWIN DUMAGUINDIN, Pasadena Police Department Officer, C. ROSA, Pasadena Police Department Officer, JOHN PEREZ, Pasadena Police Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
