Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15769
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arogant Hollywood, et al v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 17-56283
Plaintiff - Appellant: AROGANT HOLLYWOOD and ALISON HELEN FAIRCHILD
Defendant - Appellee: STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington state corporation, ANNE SLOANE, TAYLOR OBERLANDER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56555
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-55208
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-36067
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights › Jobs
Douglas DiBiasi v. Starbucks Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35583
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOUGLAS J. DIBIASI
Defendant - Appellee: STARBUCKS CORPORATION, LESLIE RUFF and HEIDI PARR
Defendant: SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, OZZIE KNEZOVICH, DAVE REAGAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-57214
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15739
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas DiBiasi v. Starbucks Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-35213
Plaintiff - Appellee: DOUGLAS J. DIBIASI
Defendant - Appellant: STARBUCKS CORPORATION, LESLIE RUFF and HEIDI PARR
Defendant: SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, OZZIE KNEZOVICH, DAVE REAGAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?