Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55089
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Raj Patel v. USA
as 23-16178
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAJ PATEL
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kimberly Newman, et al v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-16202
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIMBERLY CARLESTE NEWMAN, LISA CABRERA, CATHERINE JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee: GOOGLE, LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC
Defendant: ALPHABET, INC.
Intervenor / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Schroeder v. USA
as 23-35606
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER SCHROEDER, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jim Navarro v. USA, et al
as 23-16108
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIM NAVARRO
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT WILKIE, Mr, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Mr, Former Social Security Commissioner and others
Ardit Ferizi v. USA
as 23-16195
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARDIT FERIZI
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Andrew Straw v. USA
as 23-16039
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW U.D. STRAW, Esquire
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
L. B. v. USA, et al
as 23-35538
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. B., individually and on behalf of D.B., a minor
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and DANA BULLCOMING, agent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs sued in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15991
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jane Doe v. USA, et al
as 23-55695
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DCA 1976

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?