Cases 141 - 150 of 500
Patrick Madsen v. Renee Baker, et al
as 18-15859
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK OWEN MADSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Patrick Decarolis v. Brian Williams, et al
as 18-15750
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK PHILIP DECAROLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Gregory Jefferson v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 18-15736
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY JEFFERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Michael Ray Hogan v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 18-99004
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY HOGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Peter Helfrich v. Brian Williams, et al
as 18-15672
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER J. HELFRICH
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Christopher Brown v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 18-15663
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Cornelius Gaines, III v. D. Neven, et al
as 18-15653
Petitioner - Appellant:
CORNELIUS A. GAINES III
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Kenneth Hendren v. Brian Williams, et al
as 18-15642
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH A. HENDREN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JO GENTRY, Warden
Jeffrey Depenbrock v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-15606
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT DEPENBROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
John Arpino v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 18-15582
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
